Nike's Struggles: Challenges and the Changing Landscape of Athleticwear

Introduction

Nike, long the dominant force in athletic wear, is grappling with a series of headwinds. Declining sales, fractured relationships with retailers, and increasing competition from newer, more agile brands like Hoka and On have put pressure on the company. Despite efforts to restructure, including leadership changes and a cost-cutting plan, Nike has struggled to regain its previous momentum. The company’s core focus on elite athletes appears out of sync with shifting market dynamics, where beginner-friendly, casual running brands have seen increased demand, especially in a post-pandemic world. Nike's ability to pivot and maintain its leadership position is now in question.

Fig 1. History of Nike brands evolution

The Shift in Consumer Preferences

Nike’s recent struggles can be seen within the broader context of evolving consumer preferences in the athleticwear market. A significant 2% drop in revenue for its fourth quarter, combined with projections of mid-single-digit declines in fiscal 2025, paints a grim picture. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, Nike anticipates a 10% drop in sales, signaling deeper issues beyond a momentary slowdown.

A major factor in Nike’s sales dip has been its over-reliance on its direct-to-consumer (DTC) strategy, which led to the company severing ties with retailers like Zappos and Big 5 Sporting Goods. Initially, this approach boosted Nike’s online sales, but as the pandemic accelerated a shift toward casual and comfort-focused athleticwear, competitors like Hoka and On took advantage of the trend. These brands offered inclusive, beginner-friendly shoes at more affordable prices, directly appealing to the broad base of recreational runners, a market segment that Nike’s performance-driven, elite-athlete-focused products struggled to connect with.

Nike is now attempting to correct course by restoring partnerships with major retailers such as Footlocker and Macy's. It is also introducing more affordable shoe lines to cater to a broader audience. However, these changes are unlikely to result in a rapid turnaround, as Nike faces significant challenges in reestablishing itself in a market that has shifted away from its traditional strengths.

Fig 2. Nike stock performance in last 5 years, showing a decline recently pulling back all gains in valuation(CapIQ).

New Brands Reshaping the Market

Nike's dominance in the athleticwear industry is being increasingly challenged by rising brands like On, Hoka, and Brooks, all of which have managed to capture significant market share by focusing on the growing demand for casual and beginner-friendly products. These competitors have taken advantage of Nike's emphasis on high-performance athletic wear, which now resonates less with the casual consumer.

On Holding, for instance, has experienced a meteoric rise, largely due to its innovative On Cloud Technology, which combines performance with comfort. The brand's lifestyle-oriented campaigns have successfully positioned it as both a premium and accessible choice, attracting a broad range of consumers. Similarly, Hoka, a subsidiary of Deckers Outdoor Corporation, has surged in popularity with its cushioned shoes that appeal to both elite and casual runners. This focus on inclusivity, comfort, and affordability contrasts sharply with Nike's performance-first, premium-priced offerings, making these brands more appealing to the modern, casual athlete.

Nike's decline can also be linked to the growth of smaller, specialized brands that are more agile and better equipped to cater to niche segments of the market. For example, Allbirds, known for its eco-friendly materials and focus on sustainability, has attracted environmentally conscious consumers, further fragmenting Nike's customer base. Similarly, Lululemon, traditionally focused on yoga apparel, has expanded into athletic shoes and activewear, posing another challenge to Nike’s once unassailable market position.

Fig 3. On Holding's stock performance in last 3years, showing upward momentum on the heels of market share growth(CapIQ).

Fig 4. Deckers Outdoor Group (Hoka, UGG, Teva, AHNU) stock performance in last 5 years, showing continuous growth, a by product of consistent and successful innovation(CapIQ).

Can Innovation Drive a Turnaround?

As Nike works to regain lost market share, the future of the athletic wear industry suggests further shifts toward inclusivity, lifestyle-focused products, and affordability. The rise of brands that emphasize comfort and versatility over elite athletic performance points to a new direction in consumer preferences. To stay competitive, Nike is reexamining its retail partnerships and expanding its product lines to include more budget-friendly options. Yet, the key to Nike's revival will likely lie in innovation. This has been an issue echoed by senior management. John Donahue, Nike's CEO, said “it’s really hard to do bold, disruptive innovation, to develop a boldly disruptive shoe on Zoom” when addressing investor criticism on other brands capturing their market share.

Historically, Nike has thrived on innovation, from its revolutionary Air Max technology to the Flyknit series. However, recent years have seen a slowdown in groundbreaking product development. To fend off competitors like On and Hoka, which have demonstrated a keen ability to blend innovation with consumer-driven design, Nike will need to reignite its innovation pipeline. This could involve embracing sustainable materials, exploring customization technologies, or leveraging advanced data analytics to create more personalized shopping experiences.

Another area where Nike could potentially regain an edge is in its investment in athleisure—a segment that blends performance and comfort for everyday wear. While brands like Lululemon and Athleta have excelled in this space, Nike has yet to fully capitalize on the booming demand for fashionable, functional athletic wear that can transition from the gym to casual settings.

Can Nike Reclaim Its Throne?

While Nike remains a global leader in athleticwear, the company faces significant challenges. The rise of brands that cater to casual, cost-conscious consumers has reshaped the industry, leaving Nike's traditional focus on elite athletes somewhat obsolete. To thrive in this new landscape, Nike must balance its legacy of performance innovation with the evolving demands of a more diverse, casual, and budget-minded customer base.

Though its recent moves—such as reviving partnerships with retailers and launching more accessible product lines—are steps in the right direction, Nike’s true test will be in its ability to innovate and adapt. As newer, more agile competitors continue to gain traction, Nike’s future dominance in the market is anything but certain.

References

Saibil, J. (2024, August 19). On holding vs. Nike: Why On’s strategy is setting it apart. Yahoo Finance.

Preston, C. (2024, August 8). Nike (NKE) stock vs. lululemon (LULU) stock: Which is the better sports apparel buy? - Cabot wealth network. Cabot Wealth.

Rogelberg, S. (2024, July 9). Nike’s sales are so poor it brought a former senior executive out of retirement to fix its relationship with retailers. Fortune.

Saul, D. (2024, June 28). Nike stock tanks 20% to 4-year low: Why the sneaker giant’s struggling. Forbes.

O'Connell, M. (2023, November 21). The growing dominance of Hoka and On Running. Business of Fashion.

Levi, A. (2024, August 12). Allbirds and the eco-friendly footwear revolution. Footwear News.

Gibson, K. (2024, January 15). Athleisure is booming: Can Nike catch up? Bloomberg Businessweek.

Foster, M. (2023, December 30). How Lululemon's expansion into footwear poses a challenge to Nike. CNBC.

Robinson, T. (2024, February 28). The rise of athleisure: Fashion meets function. Vogue Business.

This communication is provided for informational purposes only. Please refer to St. George Capital's research reports related to its contents for more information, including important disclosures. St. George Capital or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries may engage in trading as principal in securities, other financial products, and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication. This communication has been prepared based on information, including market prices, data, and other sources believed to be reliable. However, St. George Capital does not warrant its completeness or accuracy, except concerning any disclosures related to St. George and/or its affiliates and an analyst's involvement with any company (or security, other financial product, or other asset class) that may be the subject of this communication.

Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. St. George Capital does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not consider individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments, or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments, or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers, or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions, or any other publicly available information. However, St. George Capital may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons.

This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of St. George Capital. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitute your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of St. George Capital.