NVIDIA...
A Bubble Ignored

NVIDIA's soaring market valuation driven by AI technologies mirrors historical speculative bubbles, raising concerns about its sustainability.
Competitive pressures from companies like AMD, Intel, and Huawei threaten NVIDIA's dominance in the AI hardware market, potentially eroding its market share and profitability.
Regulatory scrutiny and ethical considerations, especially regarding AI's societal impact and data privacy, pose significant risks to NVIDIA's growth and operational strategies.
The rapid growth of AI applications faces challenges due to data needs, privacy concerns, and infrastructure limitations, questioning the feasibility of widespread AI adoption in the near term.
NVIDIA’s continued reliance on innovation and substantial R&D investments is crucial for maintaining its competitive edge but may not be sustainable if the AI market matures slower than expected.

Key Takeaways

Overview

NVIDIA has established itself as a frontrunner in the AI hardware market, largely due to its pioneering role in GPU development and deep learning technologies. However, the escalating valuation of NVIDIA prompts a critical evaluation against the backdrop of historical market corrections and the challenges faced by once-dominant companies.

Overestimation of Industry by Investors

The late 1990s witnessed a surge in investment in internet-based companies, driven by the rapid adoption of the internet and its perceived potential to transform business and society. This period, known as the dot-com bubble, was characterized by speculative investment and the proliferation of startups with "dot-com" in their names, many of which conducted initial public offerings (IPOs) despite lacking sustainable business models or, in some cases, any revenue. Investors were eager to back any company associated with the internet, leading to soaring stock prices and IPOs that often saw stock values double on their first day of trading. Many dot-com companies focused on growth and market share rather than profitability, burning through cash without a clear path to revenue. The bubble burst in 2000 when interest rates increased, and investors began to re-evaluate the valuations of dot-com companies. This led to a sharp decline in stock prices and the collapse of many businesses. The NASDAQ Composite reached an all-time high of 5,048.62 on March 10, 2000, before crashing to 1,114.11 by October 2002, a drop of about 78%.

The dot-com bubble was characterized by the overvaluation of companies based on speculative future success rather than current fundamentals. NVIDIA, as a leading provider of GPUs essential for AI and deep learning, has seen its valuation soar due to the AI boom. There's a risk that investor enthusiasm for AI and NVIDIA's pivotal role in it might lead to an overestimation of its sustainable growth potential, mirroring the speculative investments of the dot-com era.

Current Advantage Fading Away

BlackBerry, developed by Research In Motion (RIM), was the leading smartphone manufacturer in the late 2000s. Known for its physical keyboard and secure email and messaging services, BlackBerry devices were synonymous with mobile communications for business professionals. However, BlackBerry failed to adapt to the changing market dynamics brought about by the introduction of the Apple iPhone in 2007 and the subsequent rise of Android smartphones. These competitors offered touchscreens, a wider range of apps, and more versatile operating systems. As consumers and businesses shifted to more versatile smartphones, BlackBerry's market share plummeted. The company struggled to revive its brand with the BlackBerry 10 operating system and devices, but it was too late. BlackBerry's global smartphone market share declined from 20% in 2009 to less than 1% by 2016.

BlackBerry lost its dominant position due to failing to adapt to market changes and underestimating competition. NVIDIA currently holds a significant competitive advantage in the AI hardware market, but it faces increasing competition from other chip manufacturers and tech companies entering the AI space. NVIDIA’s ability to sustain growth is dependent upon its ability to maintain a competitive advantage in the rapidly growing market for hardware for machine learning and AI.

Competitors

AMD represents the single largest competitor of NVIDIA, originally in the gaming GPU space, and now entering the realm of AI. AMD’s December 2023 release of the MI300 chip was a massive success, with experts agreeing that AMD’s MI300 outshines NVIDIA’s H100 at up to a quarter of the cost to customers. This success was reflected in a 10% increase in AMD’s share price the day after release. While retail customers may be drawn to NVIDIA’s image and reputation in the AI and chip-design space, corporate clients are more likely to favor higher performance at a lower cost, which AMD provides. Additionally, AMD and NVIDIA experience the same technological production limitations, as both chip designers outsource their production to TSMC. The risk here is that AMD stands to catch up to or even outshine NVIDIA’s chips, as innovation slows due to their shared production ceiling. These production challenges have already begun to show, as NVIDIA’s novel Blackwell architecture is built on the less advanced 5nm-class chips, as opposed to the most recent 3nm-class, as TSMC struggles with meeting demand.

AMD

Another competitor arises in the form of Intel. On March 20th, 2024, the Biden administration announced a preliminary $8.5 billion in grants, $11 billion in loans, and a further $25 billion in tax rebates for the construction, expansion, or modernization of Intel chip-producing factories. However, it appears the company seeks to hedge its exposure to the chip-design space against the likes of NVIDIA and AMD. Intel CEO, Pat Gelsinger, has indicated that they plan to sign both companies as customers, increasing the domestication of the production of microchips in the US. In the short term, this cash injection is unlikely to have a significant impact, as the factories are not set to start production until 2025. Over time, if Intel can catch up with TSMC’s production, its control over domestic chip production may give it an edge against other chip designers, threatening NVIDIA’s market share. On the other hand, with the potential for trade disruptions between Taiwan and the US due to increasing political tensions with China, local chip production may provide NVIDIA with greater stability. Overall, Intel’s participation in the chip manufacturing and design space may have mixed impacts on NVIDIA.

INTEL

In response to increasing competition, on March 18th, 2024, NVIDIA announced Blackwell. NVIDIA’s CEO, Jensen Huang, has indicated that NVIDIA aims to get ahead of the curve when it comes to “physical AI” (i.e., AI in robotic systems). NVIDIA’s diversification into areas such as robotics, self-driving vehicles, and gaming hardware is essential for maintaining its competitive edge and sustaining growth.

Regulatory Risks

For much of the 20th century, AT&T monopolized the American telecommunications industry. The U.S. government challenged this monopoly in a landmark antitrust case, leading to the divestiture of AT&T's local telephone service operations into seven independent Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), also known as the "Baby Bells," in 1984. AT&T's breakup was driven by regulatory concerns over its monopoly, which stifled competition and innovation. While NVIDIA is not in a total monopoly position like AT&T was, the growing importance of AI and NVIDIA's significant role in it could attract regulatory scrutiny, especially if NVIDIA's market power were to limit competition or if AI technologies raise broader societal and ethical concerns.

The list of global jurisdictions enacting antitrust investigations into NVIDIA’s business practices, including the US, EU, UK, France, and China, is ever-expanding. The scrutiny stems from suspected anticompetitive practices in the GPU sector, a global industry for which NVIDIA commands an 80% monopoly. Last year, French antitrust enforcers raided NVIDIA offices to search the premises, seize physical and digital materials, and interview employees, suggesting NVIDIA’s reign in the chipmaking and cloud technology market is not going unnoticed by governments. Additionally, the Biden administration has set plans in motion to halt shipments of AI chips and chip-making tools, including those made by NVIDIA, to China in an attempt to curb the country’s supercomputing and military advancements. Upon announcement of these regulations, NVIDIA’s share price suffered a 3.7% fall. As of Q1 2024, the repercussions for NVIDIA are further materializing, as domestic Chinese chip designers intensify their efforts to fill the market gap.

Market Expectations vs. Reality: A House of Cards Built on AI Hype

NVIDIA's impressive financials are heavily reliant on future potential, particularly in AI. However, investor enthusiasm for AI's revolutionary potential might outpace the current reality of AI adoption across industries. Most AI applications today are niche and require significant customization, making them less profitable than traditional software. The long-term trajectory of AI development is uncertain, and widespread AI integration may not be as rapid as anticipated. Delays in AI adoption could hinder NVIDIA's projected growth. Furthermore, the current business models for many AI applications are unclear, and monetization strategies beyond selling hardware for AI development are still being developed.

While core businesses like gaming are strong, they have vulnerabilities. The gaming industry is cyclical, and a potential economic downturn could lead to a significant drop in consumer spending on high-end GPUs. New console generations with improved graphics capabilities could dampen PC gaming hardware sales in the short term.

While AI is a promising field, its widespread adoption might not be as rapid as some anticipate. Delays in AI integration could hinder NVIDIA's projected growth. Emerging disruptors, such as neuromorphic computing, threaten NVIDIA's dominance. These new architectures could outperform traditional GPUs in specific AI tasks, requiring significant innovation from NVIDIA to stay relevant.

Ethical and Societal Implications

Widespread use of AI for tasks like facial recognition raises significant privacy concerns, potentially leading to public backlash and stricter regulations that could limit the adoption of certain AI applications and impact NVIDIA's market reach. Automation powered by AI could result in job losses in various sectors, damaging NVIDIA's brand reputation and possibly prompting regulatory restrictions on AI usage in specific industries. The broader societal, privacy, and ethical implications of AI technology are profound, disrupting traditional methodologies in healthcare, agriculture, finance, and more. AI's reliance on extensive personal data challenges existing data protection norms, raising issues about data origin, storage, access, and usage.

The ability of AI to analyze data without human intervention intensifies security concerns, including unauthorized dissemination of information, identity theft, and surveillance. Current privacy regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, were created before the widespread adoption of AI and may not adequately address its complexities. As AI regulations evolve, NVIDIA will likely face increasing pressure to comply with new policies. For instance, two former NVIDIA employees recently left the company, citing concerns about AI's potential dangers and warning of increasing regulatory scrutiny. NVIDIA must address these challenges to maintain its market standing and ensure the safe and inclusive development of AI technology.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, while NVIDIA's advancements in AI technology have propelled its market valuation to impressive heights, the parallels with historical market bubbles and increasing competitive pressures suggest potential risks. Regulatory scrutiny and ethical considerations further complicate the landscape, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of NVIDIA's growth. As AI continues to disrupt various industries, the challenges of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and societal impact cannot be overlooked. It is clear that for NVIDIA to maintain its market position and drive future success, it must navigate these complexities with a focus on innovation, compliance, and ethical AI development.

References

The Economist. (2024). AMD’s MI300 Chip Challenges NVIDIA.

CNN. (2024). Biden Administration Announces Chip Factory Grants.

CNBC. (2024). Intel's Strategic Moves in the Chip Market.

Globe and Mail. (2024). TSMC's Production Challenges Impacting NVIDIA.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2024). NVIDIA Annual Report.

NVIDIA. (2024). Overcoming Challenges in AI.

NVIDIA News. (2024). Foundation Model Isaac Robotics Platform.

Financial Times. (2024). Regulatory Scrutiny on NVIDIA's Market Practices.

This communication is provided for informational purposes only. Please refer to St. George Capital's research reports related to its contents for more information, including important disclosures. St. George Capital or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries may engage in trading as principal in securities, other financial products, and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication. This communication has been prepared based on information, including market prices, data, and other sources believed to be reliable. However, St. George Capital does not warrant its completeness or accuracy, except concerning any disclosures related to St. George and/or its affiliates and an analyst's involvement with any company (or security, other financial product, or other asset class) that may be the subject of this communication.

Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. St. George Capital does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not consider individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments, or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments, or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers, or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions, or any other publicly available information. However, St. George Capital may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons.

This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of St. George Capital. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitute your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of St. George Capital.

NVIDIA... A Bubble Ignored

​

Key Takeaways​